Analysis: How Does The Infinity Ward Fiasco Affect Call Of Duty?
[Amid speculation that lawsuits and defections could shutter Infinity Ward, our own Kris Graft has been polling analysts, gamers and others on the effect the situation has on the Call of Duty series.]
Ever since Activision fired the two heads of its prized Modern Warfare creator Infinity Ward, video game websites and forums have gone into meltdown mode.
Here you have the world's biggest video game publisher axing Jason West and Vince Zampella, the two heads of a subsidiary that just made their parent over $1 billion with November's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. Now, at least today in the media, Infinity Ward is associated with lawsuits, employee defections and general drama.
With Infinity Ward losing about a quarter of its employees following West and Zampella's firings, and a new lawsuit that has former and current staff suing Activision for unpaid royalties and bonuses, there's speculation that Activision could just opt to close Infinity Ward.
But at this point, would it even matter if Infinity Ward's name was laid to rest? What would that mean for the Call of Duty franchise, and does the average gamer -- or even average Call of Duty fan -- care about the dispute? We spoke with analysts, gamers, journalists and retail to find out.
A Dignified Death?
Janco Partners' Mike Hickey, the analyst who first publicly speculated that Infinity Ward could shutter amid the staff defection, said it may be in the best interest of Activision and remaining Infinity Ward employees to let the studio die a dignified death.
"We think that a more effective way to rebuild a studio’s mojo would be to take the remaining creative force and allow them to shape their own future and subsequent ego identification through a new studio, as opposed to always trying to relive past Infinity Ward glory," Hickey said.
"It would seem that the studio shock from massive employee defections has likely destroyed any remaining creative culture within Infinity Ward."
But not all industry watchers agree that Infinity Ward is at death's door. "There are a lot of unknowns out there right now, but so far we don’t believe [Infinity Ward] will be shut down," said Todd Greenwald with Signal Hill. "We think Activision will retain the studio -- even if is largely in name only -- assuming it still has brand equity."
Greenwald added, "If Infinity Ward winds up being a liability -- that is, a constant reminder of the ugly fallout post-Modern Warfare 2 -- then certainly Activision may just scrap the name and rebrand it."
The analyst said that he expects the widely-expected Modern Warfare 3, no matter who creates it, to "easily" sell more than 10 million units.
Wedbush's Michael Pachter called Hickey's speculation of a studio closure earlier this week "overly melodramatic," although he did say that he believes "this situation has escalated well beyond what [Activision] intended."
The dispute between Activision and Infinity Ward has had an impact on Activision stock in recent days as well. "It appears to me that investors believe that Activision has transformed itself from a relatively fair employer into the Evil Empire, with contentious dealings between the company and employees the norm," Pachter said.
Has The Dispute Tainted Call of Duty?
Infinity Ward has a large fanbase. Out of the millions of Call of Duty consumers, there is a core contingent that is aware of what's going on at Infinity Ward right now. They know that the studio created a Call of Duty game every other year with Treyarch, and they know that Infinity Ward is the series originator. This group is concerned about the future of the franchise and is disenchanted with the publisher of one of their favorite series.
"Honestly, after Activision fired Vince and Jason, I sold my copy of Modern Warfare 2 and bought [EA's] Bad Company 2 instead," said grad student John Vanderhoef of Milwaukee.
One Seattle-based gamer said, "Activision has reached Walmart status in my mind, in that I absolutely refuse to pay for another game [or] DLC from them." But the gamer is willing to make an exception, despite the concern. "If the game really is all sorts of awesome, I may be willing to buy it used."
David Eckelberry, lead gameplay designer with LucasArts, said that the debacle between Activision and Infinity Ward has had "no effect whatsoever" on his views of the current Call of Duty game and franchise.
However, of the future of Call of Duty, he remains "entirely skeptical." He said, "[There's] definite room to pause and consider the quality level of the next installment of Call of Duty. Though honestly, the masses will decide this -- if everyone on my 360 friends list is playing Modern Warfare 3 -- or whatever -- then I’m going to join the party."
Some gamers, like game journalist Jason Dobson, are taking a wait-and-see attitude. "I prefer to separate the art from the artist, and reserve judgment of where the next studio will take Call of Duty until I play the game."
Law student and Popmatters game critic L.B. Jeffries said that the fallout between the employees and Activision could well turn out to be a good thing. "Modern Warfare 2 was a bloated, misguided, and over-designed hubristic mess," Jeffries said. "The franchise needed new handlers and Infinity Ward needed a new project."
Jeff Cary, an employee at the independent Indiana-based video game retail chain McVan's, offered, "Most people won't care because they don't even understand that the Call of Duty games are developed by different studios. Video game developers only matter to people who like to nerd out on games, like myself. Other than that Activision just needs to put out a quality Call of Duty every year and the masses will be happy."
Analyst Greenwald agreed: "Who knows how much of this controversy will still be relevant 18 months from now," he said. "Furthermore, Call of Duty is such a mass-market brand with broad appeal way beyond the hard-core gamer, that the vast majority of Call of Duty buyers likely have no idea who Vince Zampella and Jason West are."
Lazard analyst Colin Sebastian added: "I don't think most consumers pay attention to which game studio develops a particular title."
Asked if the dispute between Activision and Infinity Ward tainted his perception of the franchise, gamer Tohon Mink summed up the thoughts of many Call of Duty fans by replying, "What dispute?"
Beyond The Fisaco
With or without Infinity Ward, it's clear that Activision is moving forward with the Call of Duty franchise in some shape or form. Beyond traditional retail releases, like Treyarch's next Call of Duty title, analyst Pachter forecast that Activision will transform the series into a subscription multiplayer game.
Activision CEO Bobby Kotick more than hinted at the prospect as early as 2008, when he said that a massively multiplayer online, monetized Call of Duty would be a "natural evolution" of the franchise.
Pachter said, "I think that the company is on the path to subscriptions, and that West and Zampella did not wish to work on that kind of game, leading to their termination. I think that over the next two years, Activision will introduce a subscription game, and think that annual Call of Duty revenues and profits will likely rise rather than decline."
Analyst Doug Creutz with Cowen and Company said, "Now that the franchise is 'established,' it becomes more a question of execution than innovation. Talent moves around in this business all the time. The key is managing your product around that."

[Every week,
Though many of years have passed since Eurocom founder and director Neil Baldwin
In an exciting week for new job postings, Gamasutra's
[Here's the first content announcement from our German colleagues who run 



['Battle Klaxon' is a
As an archetypal wandering samurai, you have no objectives. No quest for revenge, no search for an item, no pressing need to save the world. Rather, the world is simply yours to tinker with, and the 'story' is simply the events you discover and the choices you make. The game definitely doesn't end if you fail a mission or murder an important character. You're genuinely free.
It's like this: Most freeform RPGs these days (Mass Effect 2, Fable 2, Fallout 3) create the illusion of freedom by placing a linear plot in a big world full of side quests. You're presented with a lot of decisions, but the consequences are usually minimal because from a design perspective you want those consequences to lock out as little content as possible.
So, how is this possible? Let's move on to WoTS's other neat trick.



Rockin' Android, the indie publisher dedicated to localizations for obscure PC
[Charles Cecil, the adventure game legend behind the acclaimed Broken Sword and Beneath a Steel Sky, talks to GSW columnist Lewis Denby about his 30 years as a storyteller, his work on the new Doctor Who video game series, and how "point-and-click isn't broken."]
If the Noby Noby Boy app doesn't completely satisfy your need to carry Keita Takahashi's bizarre game with you wherever you go, Namco Bandai has come up with another way for the stretchy figure to live in your iPhone/iPod Touch; it's 
[Just a note for any GameSetWatch readers in the game biz who don't have their resume uploaded to our sister site
[We're partnering with game criticism site 
[Checking out student game and IGF Student Showcase winner 
Nobody noticed it because it was
[Gods at Play is a new, regular GameSetWatch column from Troy Goodfellow about design issues and gamer experiences in strategy games. How can strategy games help us understand the nature of play and the minds of players? This week, Troy looks at how two different games approach the problem of AI advisors.]
By starting you off with a lot of automation, Distant Worlds is the inverse of most 4x design. It doesn't ask you whether you want to cede control; it asks you whether you want to take it.
Once you've let go, it's hard to break yourself of the mindset that you could be doing it better. It's one thing to give up the boring duty of finishing off Denmark's army, but do you really want to blindly follow the AI prescriptions on what units to build? How does it know what I plan on doing? 

[Every week, we sum up sister iPhone site 


[The game industry tends to be so obsessed with latching onto the next big innovation that it fails to flesh out -- or improve -- existing game concepts and ideas that are still viable, says Gamasutra's Kris Graft in this new editorial.]
[A near-final reminder to our friends in Canada that our colleagues'
[In this interview for GameSetWatch conducted by Andrew Vanden Bossche, we talk to Loren Schmidt to satisfy our curiosity on his beautifully constructed, pixel-heavy PC/Mac freeware action game Star Guard, finding out just how its 1982-era lookalike retro charm was birthed.]
Is there anything you wish you could have put in but couldn't?
[We round up the week's top news and interviews from sister console digital download site 




Putting together stories from the rest of the Gamasutra network, here's the top full-length features of the past week on big sister 'art and business of gaming' site
[‘Design Diversions’ is a 







