The Remo Files: The Crysis Warhead PC Explained
[On occasion, I may be reading my Gamasutra colleague Chris Remo's excellent weblog, and ask nicely to yoink one of his posts for GameSetWatch. This post -- dealing with his chat to the Crytek folks about their custom-branded Crysis-related PC -- is one of those.]
About a month ago, I reported that EA was planning to market a Crysis Warhead-ready PC. I have now learned that the machine—which, at least among the Crytek staff that specced it out, is called the “Warhead PC”—will be officially announced next week.
In my original post, I pegged the price to be between $600 and $800; as it turns out, it’s almost exactly in between, at $699, and it will apparently be coming in a single SKU. It will be sold by UltraPC, and unveiled by EA. Crytek, Nvidia, EA, and UltraPC were all involved.
I spoke with Crysis franchise producer Bernd Diemer, who explained the history behind the machine. ”When we started working on Warhead, we decided performance was a big issue,” he said. “So we said, ‘Guys, we’re going to build a PC which has a maximum price of six or seven hundred dollars, and it has to run Warhead in high spec at an average framerate of 30.’ We built that PC—Crytek in the Budapest office [where Warhead was developed]—and we put it in the middle of the studio, and every review was on that machine. All the milestone presentations we did for EA, for the Yerlies [founding brothers Cevat, Avni, and Faruk], for the team, all the new prototypes, we showed on that machine.”
Eventually, they began referring to it as “the Warhead PC,” and used it as a way to force efficiency and optimization: if frames were dropping on the Warhead PC on a high graphics level, the team would tweak the game to better scale to the hardware. (I can attest to the results, having played through a full level today and being impressed by the consistent framerate and visuals, before being told it was a “Warhead PC.”)
“For us, it was really helpful, because we sort of had a hard cap,” Diemer told me. “You couldn’t say, ‘It works on my computer, looks great on my machine.’ No no no, this is the benchmark, guys. If it sucks on this, the whole thing sucks. For us as a team, that was really valuable. We had a tangible border we could bump our heads into.”
The Crytek team originally planned simply to give the Warhead PC’s specs to EA to use for the recommended requirements, but eventually Nvidia got involved and it became clear that there was no reason that such a machine couldn’t simply be sold straight to consumers looking for an easy entry (or re-entry) into PC gaming.
Though I don’t have every nitty gritty hardware detail, I did get the machine’s most important specs:
- CPU: Intel Core Duo e7300 (@2.66GHz)
- Video card: Nvidia 9800GT
- RAM: 2GB
I snapped a picture of the Warhead PC I used today. It had no external branding, and it wasn’t clear whether the final version (which can be preordered next week and will ship alongside Crysis Warhead on September 16) will, although a Crysis-themed desktop background will be preloaded. It’s a visually conservative rig, but I appreciated that there weren’t a dozen obnoxious blue neon lights swirling visibly through a plexiglass window—we’ll see what the shipping machine brings.
As Diemer was sure to point out, ”EA’s not getting into the hardware business, and Crytek isn’t either.” Rather, the companies are trying to practically combat the idea that to play high-end PC games at high levels of detail, you need to spend in excess of a thousand dollars. “The biggest thing for us is convenience,” Diemer added. “We want to make PC gaming convenient.”









Comments
This sounds like pretty awesome news. Any word on if the games will actually be included with the PC? Or is this just the machine they're selling?
Posted by: Anon | September 8, 2008 11:03 AM
Does anyone have the exact specs for the PC? If not could i have your personnal opinion on if it would work as a houshold computer and a gaming computer. My mom wants a computer that can do youtube, itunes, windows media player, M word ETC...
Posted by: Poggle | September 8, 2008 3:28 PM
This is exactly what the computer gaming industry needs. Instead of making a game and testing it on different hardware to see if it works, make a game to run extremely well on specific mid-range hardware. Optimizing code is a really good way to up the performance of a game for any hardware, this is all console developers do (take a look at FF VII to FF IX). Although it's really hard to do for the wide array of hardware out there now, this is a big step in the right direction.
Posted by: Airrax | September 8, 2008 6:44 PM
9800GT isnt even mainstream yet...
Posted by: me | September 9, 2008 3:25 AM
they claim that they want pc gaming to be convinient when they put this crap game out absolute BSery. do it the people who make call of duty or the unreal tournament series.
Posted by: melv | September 9, 2008 3:35 AM
maybe they should spec 4gig ram for the stupid drm that ea is gonna force gamers to use!
Posted by: xboxplayer | September 9, 2008 3:38 AM
I'd like to see the motherboard model. This sounds very interesting.
Posted by: Matt Buckley | September 9, 2008 6:30 AM
2gb works well enough unless its going to have Vista 64 bit.
maybe 3gb at the most would be an inprovement.
I'm also curious where they're saving the money at, cheap Mobo? small hard drives?
Posted by: Justin van herwaarden | September 9, 2008 9:44 AM
30fps... AT WHAT RESOLUTION?
Posted by: Brose | September 9, 2008 5:07 PM
@ poggle... yeah, this would be fine for basic surfing too.
personally, i think this is a great idea for cross promotion. I know some people who would love to be playing pc games, but building a monster is beyond their interest level, and they don't know enough to build one on the cheap. As no one seriously will go after an hp, or similar model for gaming, since the wal-mart brands have all garnered such a reputation as junk for gaming, this provides a good alternative.
I have a friend who is already chomping at the bit to get his hands on this...
mind you, he isn't brave enough to spend $700 to have a custom system built for gaming, since "it'll be obsolete by the next game i am really interested in...."
Posted by: wdwillis | September 10, 2008 5:24 PM
not falling for it. until they go back and fix the original (which I couldn't finish because of a bug) I ain't gonna touch it with a 10ft pole. REMEMBER PEOPLE CRYTEK SAID THE EXACT SAME THING WHEN THEY DEVELOPED CRYSIS. blah blah blah it will run on low-end machines blah blah. see how that turned out?
Posted by: magnetik | September 11, 2008 9:32 AM
I hope it's running at a high res (preferably 1920x1080). If it was run at 1280x1024, I'm going to be upset. I already run Crysis at 30FPS at that level with my 8800GT and AMD x2 4200+
Posted by: tehGuy | September 11, 2008 4:37 PM
This reminds me of that one time when Microsoft started handing out stickers that said "Vista ready"
Posted by: Troy | September 13, 2008 6:04 PM
the 9800GT is an 8800GT rebranded. i have one with 1GB memory. it runs crysis at 30fps at 1680x1050 so warhead should give me atleast 5-7 fps
Posted by: Jo Mackelroy | September 17, 2008 4:49 PM
I won't buy the game until they make a version that runs constantly above 30fps with my ATI HD4850.
Please email me when that's ready, EA GAMES!!!!!
Posted by: jdawg | September 18, 2008 8:28 PM
My computer will, in fact, run Crysis.
Posted by: web | September 23, 2008 8:16 AM