[*UPDATE*: Download the original game or play the first-month challengers for the $10,000 Dobbs Challenge modding contest - enter now, contest ends June 13th!]

« Treasure Fan? (In Comparison) You Ain't No Treasure Fan! | Main | GameSetNetwork: From Empires Of Sports To Fall Of Liberties »

Game Developer's Top 20 Publishers - The Sassy Version!

- So, you may remember that we recently asked for comments to help with reputational and specific direct-interaction comments from more than 300 game professionals, to help make up our Game Developer's Top 20 Publishers.

We're just finishing up the article itself, which is going to debut in the October 2007 issue of the magazine, alongside a a Game Developer Research report that will list all our the responses, comments, and detailed data. Look for the rundown to be released online in early October.

Anyhow, a lot of the anonymous 'reputational' responses ended up being somewhat polarizing and rhetoric-flecked. But when combing the comments, we kept spotting one particularly witty anonymous responder - and we thought his comments on some of the major publishers were worth printing in full here on GSW, for acerbic laughs, if nothing else:

"Activision - Solid - if unimaginative
Atari - First the good news. Bruno's gone. Now the bad news. Bruno's gone.
Codemasters - Plucky, intelligent senior management willing to take a risk.
Disney Interactive - Does what it says on the tin - and no more.
Eidos/SCi - Could yet grab defeat from the jaws of victory.
Electronic Arts - Currently in therapy.
Konami - Trying to be less Japanese. Currently failing.
LucasArts - Looking increasingly rudderless - the industry's biggest vanity publisher
Majesco - Two words - New. Jersey. 'Nuff said.
Microsoft - Succeeding in spite of itself. Will miss Peter Moore more than they know.
Midway - Sumner Redstone's folly. Spectacularly, almost entertainingly bad.
NCSoft - Playing the long game - and has the cash to do it.
Nintendo - It's their ball - and we can all play with it - on their terms.
Sega - One to watch - clever, nimble leadership who know how to succeed.
Sony Computer Entertainment - Sadly lacking leadership skills at the highest level - expect changes in 2008.
Take-Two - GTA 4 better be good.........
THQ - Looking a bit lost - despite some good work, does anyone know what is THQ for?
Ubisoft - The amazing Guillemots and their dedicated senior team run rings around slower, bigger competitors.
Vivendi Games - World class - in parts."

[Disclaimer: GameSetWatch doesn't necessarily think this arch wit is right. And fortunately, most responders to the survey were a little less flippant. We do think he's pretty amusing, though, whoever he is.]

Comments

Of course the Nintendo one is positive while the Sony one is negative.

I don't see the Nintendo comment as positive... The most positive comments are on Codemasters, NCSoft, Sega, and Ubisoft.

Succulently put! Well done that anonymous person, I enjoyed reading them. A fair set of witty (and probably honest) opinions, I wonder what the more serious ones will be.

I seem to recall a interview whereas THQ was coined for it's longer name of Toy Headquarters or something like that.

"He" might not be a "he".

Inside THQ, the name has been known to mean "To Hell with Quality."

Where's Square-Enix on this list? Surely they are bigger than freaking *Codemasters* (who?)!

Post a comment



If you enjoy reading WorldsInMotion.biz, you might also want to check out these CMP Game Group sites:

Gamasutra (the 'art and business of games'.)

Game Career Guide (for student game developers.)

Games On Deck (serving mobile game developers.)

Indie Games (for independent game players/developers.)

Game Set Watch (the Group's alt.game weblog.)


Weekly Archive

GameSetWatch is an alt.video game weblog from the people who run:



Copyright © 2008 Think Services