'Gaymers: Not A Simple Word'
Over at GSW sister educational site Game Career Guide, there's an interesting little feature called 'Gaymers: Not a Simple Word', which points out: "“Gamer,” like “reader,” can encompass a diversity of people, from casual gamers to import gamers to cyberathletes (“Gamer”)."
It continues: "In fact, new variations of the word continue to pop up in various gaming circles. “Gaymer,” one such variation, is used to describe lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) gamers. While the origin of “gaymer” is hard to pinpoint, it’s clear that the term has garnered some attention. Many embrace it for its sense of community; others decry it as exclusionary."
Why so? "In a recent online discussion, some LGBT people expressed their discomfort with “gaymer.” After all, it does construct a straight-gay binary that leaves no room for in-between space, fluidity, or alternate identities. The potential for exclusion is great. Furthermore, “gaymer” is also used derogatorily. UrbanDictionary.com, a site dedicated to slang, lists five definitions for “gaymer” and three of them reveal that it’s meant as an insult. It’s no surprise then that some people dislike “gaymer.”" It's an intriguing discussion, FWIW.









Comments
"Many embrace it for its sense of community; others decry it as exclusionary."
...And still others just think it sounds dumb! (The word, I mean.)
Posted by: Shih Tzu | February 21, 2007 7:20 PM
I understand the gay community loves its solidarity, but the term "gamer" itself is becoming the bland marketing buzzword of yesteryear for anyone who didn't already use it, and any concern over variations on it, such as "gaymer," is like trying to make sunglasses cool again by selling them in different colors.
That, and it's exclusionary nature. It entails that there is an experience in being non-straight and playing video games that straight people can never understand. It's making a clubhouse that says "no straights allowed."
Posted by: Jeff E. | February 21, 2007 7:37 PM
It's not just the gay community, it's all communities. It becomes more pronounced and noticeable in smaller communities though.
It's a little silly. I look forward to a day when we can all get over ourselves and be individuals first, rather than promoting our arbitrary, divisionary group membership. Otherwise I can see the trend of meaningless labels expanding. I'm going to write Sony a strongly-worded letter because people in my tax-bracket are underrepresented!
Posted by: Jared B. Good | February 22, 2007 10:14 AM