Why Vista Doesn't Mean The End For PC Indies
Stephen Totilo has once again written a story interesting enough to make me venture within MTV's Stygian halls of autoplay videos and interstitial gum ad hell, and this one talks about Windows Vista's (lack of?) chilling effect on indies, cuing off a Gamasutra opinion piece by WildTangent founder and CEO Alex St. John.
St. John had claimed: "We have found many of the security changes planned for Vista alarming and likely to present sweeping challenges for PC gaming, especially for online distributed games", pinpointing specific issues with the cost of rating games with the ESRB and lockdown issues around parental controls. Totilo cornered Chris Donohue, the director of business development for Games for Windows, who downplayed St. John's concerns:
"I don't think we're artificially restricting anyone, he said. "But on the other side of it there's a yin and a yang to allowing anybody to publish anything on your platform. You're going to get a lot of good stuff and some not-so-good stuff." He also added on the cost of getting a game rated: "A couple of thousand bucks doesn't necessarily work for the casual guys." So what's the end result? Probably that Vista is more of a pain, but Microsoft claims it's a survivable and necessary pain in the interests of locking down PCs from evil content. We'll see, I guess.









Comments
"We have found many of the security changes planned for Vista alarming and likely to present sweeping challenges for PC gaming, especially for online distributed games"
Why am I not the least bit surprised that a developer whose products have continually been labled as spyware by a large number of different scanners is so concerned about tighter security?
Frankly, with the exception of the bit about the ESRB, him complaining about it actually do more to make me want Vista than anything I've read.
Posted by: J Arcane | January 26, 2007 9:57 PM
I work in IT(and also game dev as a possible career).
Wild Tagent is a mess and IS spyware. Im glad he is having to rethink his buisiness model because I can't stand seeing users with this on their PC's, and they have no idea how it got there.
Posted by: A Nonymous | January 28, 2007 10:41 AM
I have no love for WildTangent either, but that doesn't change the fact that St John raises valid concerns for ANY casual game publisher.
The concerns he lists would have just as negative an effect on games from PopCap, Pogo, or any other downloadable casual games portal. There is nothing in his opinion piece that is specific to WildTangent's spyware-ish behavior.
Posted by: josh g. | January 28, 2007 8:25 PM