COLUMN: 'Game Rag Slapdown' - An Open Apology To G4TV
July 26, 2006 10:51 PM |
[The 'Game Rag Slapdown' is an exclusive bi-weekly Thursday feature written by The Game Rag's Nathan Smart that's always video game related, sometimes funny ha ha, but mostly funny hee hee (and sometimes funny, period). This week, Nathan apologizes to G4TV.]
<== Here is what this apology references ==>
Dear G4TV,
I just wanted to take this time to apologize for publishing a series of articles in which one of my writers watches your channel for 24 hours and then talks about what he experienced while watching.
This is truly unacceptable. I know that one of the bullet points of your mission statement is to "get rid of viewers" and with this article we have stopped that with a bullet point proof vest. I have talked with the writer and he is being promptly promoted to Features Editor as punishment for this journalistic crime. He will now have more work than ever and your staff, more than anyone, knows how much it sucks to have to work.
When he first approached me with the idea I said no right away. I had told him that you guys didn't like people watching their shows but he went ahead and did it against my wishes. When I read it, I felt I had to publish it. If anything I thought that maybe it would do your viewers good and turn them away, thus, fulfilling your mission statement.* What I didn't realize is that you don't even want ONE person watching - even for the greater good!
This is why I, Nathan Smart, applaud you. You don't subscribe to the 'mix in a little bit of evil with the good' philosophy and that's commendable. You stick to your guns. You shoot from the hip. You keep it real. You're the man now dog. You are.
So, again, I say, "I'm sorry." I apologize for boosting your ratings by one. I'll be keeping a steady hand over my writer stable from now on. Anyone steps out of line... *SMACK* "You lose all the money you made today!"** Thanks again for voicing your concerns and then deleting them like you never said them. I appreciate the taken back criticism.
*Am I supposed to put a comma after 'thus?'
**That is what I would say to them because I treat my writers like whores.
[Nathan Smart is a fake news writer for The Game Rag and really enjoys the benefits of it (no facts, no research, no real interviews). He also does Bobby McFerrin versions of indie rock songs with his one man group Indie Blockedappella. He thinks things are funny.]
Categories: Column: Game Rag Slapdown








8 Comments
classic.
It's funny how their best show [cinematech] is nothing more than them cutting together other people's work and adding commercials.
While we're all apologizing, I'd like to apologize to G4 for ever watching their network. I didn't realise the Hague considered it torture and/or a crime against humanity.
d | July 26, 2006 7:08 PM
I don't have G4 anymore but when I did have it I did not like the direction they were going, the best show was X-Play with Morgan Webb, I miss seeing that but not G4.
Walter Crespo | July 26, 2006 8:13 PM
While showing Star Trek isn't all that bad, G4 has proven time and again that it's run by confused middle-managers who cave to the opinions of marketers and vocal forum-trolling adolescents by cutting any decent show or talent (Screen Savers), buying reruns of largely cancelled schlock (Fastlane, Man Show), and turning the "gaming" network into a poor-man's SpikeTV, minus original programming or UFC. Even their crown jewel, X-Play, would rank as an "polished driveway pebble" on most other channels.
And I believe no comma is necessary after that application of "thus."
Jeff E. | July 26, 2006 9:54 PM
hey D, trust me Cinematech takes a lot more than that. Thanks for the ~best show~ comment, but realize that there's actually a lot of work going on behind the scenes by a tiny staff. Believe me, there is a possibility of making Bad Cinematech.
Ryan in Exile | July 27, 2006 2:15 AM
No, I don't think you need that comma after 'thus'. ;)
wht.rbt | July 27, 2006 6:26 AM
I'm a hardcore gamer. That's why I visit this website frequently. I don't appreciate G4TV because its cool to say that I don't like them when I post things on the internet. **Insert smart guy remark. ***Insert another smart guy remark. Fun. Gamers rulz! Roxor!1!11!! 13371!
Tom Jenkins | July 27, 2006 3:42 PM
I was joking there Ryan, I know it's not a simple show to make. The editing and the amount of footage you guys and gals go through is a lot of work, not to mention the motion graphics for the show. I also know it's possible to have a bad show because I've seen one or two, but they are usually quite good. I wasn't joking about it being the best show. It's the only show that I would sit down and watch on the network.
d | July 27, 2006 7:33 PM
That poor man's spike tv comment nailed it. Star trek is fine and all, but c'mon folks. The station is losing the tech/game angle and is showing nothing of interest for us. We have all seen the star treks. What's with hours of them around primetime, followed by the ultra lame man show?
I used to like the station, and I loved tech tv. Now, I can due with out watching the other stations leftovers put together to save g4 from having to spend a cent on originality.
Duke | July 28, 2006 9:34 AM