Sonic - 15, And Totally Not A Rodent!
June 23, 2006 10:38 AM | Simon Carless
So, you may have seen the news, as reprinted on sister site Gamasutra, that Sega's lovable mascot Sonic The Hedgehog has turned 15, and has incidentally "sold more than 44 million units worldwide" in the process.
But in the initial story, we described Sonic as an 'azure rodent speedster', and Josiah Colborn wrote in to rage: "...in the recent Gamasutra news story by Jason Dobson about Sonic the Hedgehog's 15th anniversary, Sonic is referred to as a famous "rodent". Rodents are characterized by their large, flat incisors, built for gnawing. Hedgehogs do not have those."
He continues: "In addition, all rodents belong to the Order "Rodentia". Hedgehogs belong to the order "Insectivora", along with shrews and moles (which are also not rodents). This is a forgivable mistake, as even www.dictionary.com lists them as rodents, with Princeton apparently backing them up." But... our journalistic reputation is ruined!
And then Josiah rages on: "People frequently refer to Diddy Kong as a chimpanzee. For the record, chimpanzees are apes, not monkeys, which do not have tails. Diddy Kong does have a tail, yet the misinformation perpetuates! I know, I'm ridiculous, but don't be surprised when I'm equally infuriated that the Geico mascot is referred to as an "Amphibian", when he is clearly a reptile." You tell 'em!
Categories: Retro








3 Comments
I'm so ashamed.
Jason Dobson | June 23, 2006 5:09 PM
Be not ashamed Jason! It's not your fault, it's the fault of this horrible world in which we live! Curse you Princeton!
Josiah Colborn | November 13, 2006 10:24 PM
I've never really thought of that before...While before I definately did not consider Sonic a rodent, I didn't really know WHAT to consider him. I don't believe Josiah is ridiculous, however. I myself hate it when people are misinformed of the obvious. (although I do admit that I thought a gecko was an amphibian)
-wii out
JJ7x | August 19, 2007 5:32 PM